Search for: "Kern County Public Works - Code Compliance Division" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The dispute centered on the interpretation of the County Code and how much discretion the County Agricultural Commissioner can exercise when approving the permits. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
The dispute centered on the interpretation of the County Code and how much discretion the County Agricultural Commissioner can exercise when approving the permits. [read post]
The dispute centered on the interpretation of the County Code and how much discretion the County Agricultural Commissioner can exercise when approving the permits. [read post]
The dispute centered on the interpretation of the County Code and how much discretion the County Agricultural Commissioner can exercise when approving the permits. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm by admin
Cast-Fab says it has corrected the problems and is now in compliance. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
Click Here Settlement Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs Colorado Bumper Exchange Site, Pueblo, Pueblo County, CO. [read post]